Attack on Pearl Harbor Critic Reviews
19 Total Reviews
9 Positive Reviews(47.4%)
10 Mixed Reviews(52.6%)
0 Negative Reviews(0%)
Sorting & View
GamingTrend
May 12, 2024
The hardcore simulations experts may not enjoy the usual advantage they have with experience in flying a plane with a realistic model, but they can still enjoy that they are "flying" and doing it with anyone whose company they enjoy.
PALGN
May 12, 2024
Attack on Pearl Harbor offers some great 'arcadey' action and some incredibly fun aerial combat that is great in short bursts. However players looking for something in a complicated/involving vein are best to look elsewhere.
Armchair Empire
May 12, 2024
In a way, Attack on Pearl Harbor succeeds in doing what the much more lauded Battlestations Midway failed to do last year, provide an arcadish Pacific air war that’s both fun (which Battlestations is) and replayable (which Battlestations is . . . not so much). Attack at Pearl Harbor’s AI is reasonably good, if a tad predictable.
PC Format
May 12, 2024
It's great fun while it lasts, but once you've got over the initial thrill of the dogfight, there's not much here to maintain interest.
Worth Playing
May 12, 2024
With its pick-up-and-play controls, intense combat sequences and surprisingly nice visuals, Attack on Pearl Harbor achieves its goal of providing relatively simplistic and fun gameplay.
GameZone
May 12, 2024
Don’t expect the game to have much to do with a true re-enactment of the Pearl Harbor attack and accept the fantasy that this game brings to the foreground. What it does, it does well.
Gamers Europe
May 12, 2024
What this game lacks is substance. The missions, the plot and so on are as easily thrown together as they are to complete. The quick bursts of fun to be had here are indeed intense, and are partially flanked by excellent graphics, but there’s no longevity in a paper-thin premise. Arcade gaming yes, just not in the maddeningly addictive sense.
GameSpot
May 12, 2024
Forget about flight-sim physics and just enjoy this dumbed-down take on air combat over the Pacific in World War II.
PC Gamer
May 12, 2024
It's a little shy on realism, challenge, and gameplay depth but Attack on Pearl Harbor still delivers an accessible and diversionary ride in some terrific old WWII warbirds.
Gamers' Temple
May 12, 2024
Attack on Pearl Harbor has its moments, but it will have trouble holding your interest all the way through the campaigns.
GameWatcher
May 12, 2024
Since this isn’t aimed toward the flight sim brigade, the control system is a critical make-or-break aspect of Attack on Pearl Harbor.
PC Gameworld
May 12, 2024
If you're looking for a game that is fun for a quick fix, but lacks any real depth then this is your game. Otherwise, don't waste your time and money.
Jolt Online Gaming UK
May 12, 2024
Perhaps the most damning evidence in the case against bothering with this game (as if AI that sees your allies forever flying into your plane and bafflingly unresponsive speed controls aren’t quite enough) is that the whole experience feels reminiscent of a dumbed-down version of Crimson Skies.
PC Zone UK
May 12, 2024
Annoyingly, there's no way to change the controls and looks-wise, it won't win any medals.
Eurogamer
May 12, 2024
If you fancy a spot of no-frills arcade dogfighting this will keep you entertained for a while, and there's also a LAN/Internet multiplayer (offering free-for-all and teamplay modes).
GameDaily
May 12, 2024
It's hard to say who the game was meant for. Maybe the game just shouldn't be played at all.
GameShark
May 12, 2024
It's too simple, too short, and becomes boring far too quickly to recommend.
IGN
May 12, 2024
Legendo has managed to take something as interesting as World War II's air battle over the Pacific and turn it into something as repetitive as bouncing a tennis ball against a wall. It offers a lot of missions, sure, but they're all basically the same three repeated ad nauseum or mashed together into one mission to make it seem new.