Brothers in Arms 3: Sons of War Critic Reviews

Brothers in Arms 3: Sons of War does its best as a cover shooter, losing touch when it comes to go wandering around the map. Nonetheless, it's a solid game, with a nice and rich single player campaign.

The franchise leaves behind the melodramatic concept of the previous episodes, but the new gameplay system, more action-focused, works well for a mobile game.

I still think the underlying game in Brother in Arms 3 is worth playing, but there are a lot of potential players that will be instantly turned off by all the freemium aspects. Sadly, I can’t say I particularly blame them in this case.

The drop-in, drop-out nature of the stages and easy to pick-up gameplay makes Brothers in Arms 3 the perfect quick-fix of battlefield action.

The combat aspects and graphics are both very good, but the all the time bars really hold this game back.

Not the best in its genre, but Brothers in Arms 3 offers intense action set in World War II.

Brothers in Arms 3: Sons of War could be great fun, but its plethora of freemium elements damage its chances.

Brothers in Arms 3 is an enjoyable shooter with lots of content and smart controls, but its buried under so many IAPs it feels like a hilarious parody of free to play games.

Brothers in Arms 3: Sons of War is an unremarkable offering that is too bland, and simplistic to recommend.

A nice shooter, dragged down by the usual freemium business model.

The potential is there for something great, but basic issues like sluggish movement, forced upgrades, and lack of an interesting story backbone leave us with exactly what Brothers in Arms originally strove so hard to set itself apart from: just another mediocre WWII shooter.